The global economy is undergoing the biggest transformation in a generation. Geopolitical tensions, protectionist pressures, and a wave of industrial policies are prompting corporations to rethink where they produce and market their goods and services to make their businesses more resilient. At the same time, demographic shifts are fueling the emergence of new centers of production and consumer demand.
Together, these forces are creating new drivers of growth and innovation, shifting the global economy’s center of gravity away from the North American and European markets that powered the 20th century.
This is happening most dramatically and visibly in the fast-growing cities of Asia, Africa, Latin America, and the Middle East. These four regions account for 45% of global gross domestic product (GDP) and 85% of the world’s population. They also are centers of urbanization, home to more than 1,500 cities with populations greater than 250,000 — more than three times the number of similar-sized cities in Europe and the United States combined.
During the next 20 years, these four regions will account for 95% of the increase in the global urban population, with 1.4 billion new city dwellers by 2045. In a decade’s time, these regions will account for 28 of the world’s 30 largest urban agglomerations, with Delhi, Dhaka, Shanghai, Kinshasa, Cairo, Mumbai, Beijing, Mexico City, and São Paulo, among others, boasting populations of between 25 and 40 million people.
The story isn’t just about megacities
Emerging markets have been increasingly influential drivers of economic and demographic growth for many years. What’s new today is the maturation of many of these markets and the sheer scale and breadth of the opportunity, which extends well beyond the emerging world’s megacities. Cities ranging from the very large to medium sized will play an important role in this tectonic shift.
This new landscape presents an enormous opportunity for corporations looking to secure their supply chains against rising protectionism and geopolitical tensions, grow their customer bases, or find new talent.
Consider the trajectory of Ho Chi Minh City. Thirty-five years ago, the Vietnamese commercial capital was an economic backwater, with a GDP per capita of a few hundred dollars and people living and working mainly in low-slung buildings. But a combination of economic reforms, free-trade agreements, and the relocation of production from an increasingly high-cost China starting in the late 2000s kickstarted the city’s export engine.
These changes have accelerated in the last five years as geopolitical tensions triggered historic shifts in global supply chains. Major multinationals like Adidas, Samsung, and H&M now source from the country. New skyscrapers tower over the city, including the imposing Landmark 81. Glitzy shopping malls are populated by luxury brands. Flights arrive daily from around the world, bringing investors and tourists.
Ho Chi Minh City’s success is being replicated in other cities benefiting from “China plus one” or nearshoring strategies, from Asian metropolises like Bangalore and Chon Buri to farther flung cities such as Monterrey and Tangier.
Dozens of cities have evolved into major commercial hubs in their own right. Hangzhou has become the center of choice for China’s world- leading technology firms and startups, research institutes, top-ranked universities, and five-star hotels. Multinationals use Mexico City both as a regional headquarters and as a global hub for design, finance, and technology talent, taking advantage of the city’s skilled workforce and North American time zone.
These large regional powerhouses are increasingly driving growth in medium-sized cities in the same country. Greater Jakarta’s commercial success has benefited neighboring cities such as Bandung, with the recent completion of a high-speed rail link strengthening commercial ties. Greater Ho Chi Minh City’s industrial parks increasingly blend into those of the neighboring cities of Bien Hoa and Thu Dau Mot.
Then there are cities that capitalize on their strategic location to serve as regional hubs of activity and distribution. Dubai designed its growth strategy as a convenient bridge between Europe and Asia and points beyond; its international airport is now the world’s second largest, serving 87 million passengers in 2023. Nairobi’s airport, meanwhile, plays a vital role in Kenya’s agro-industrial strategy. It ships $660 million worth of cut flowers annually to buyers from Brussels to Beijing.
Some of these fast-growing cities face challenges as well as opportunities, particularly from the impact of climate change. Worsening floods have hit low-income communities in Lagos, for instance, while water shortages are posing a threat to continued growth in Bangalore, the center of India’s high-tech industry, and driving fresh investment in water recycling. Elsewhere, civil conflict has disrupted Addis Ababa’s rapidly growing textile manufacturing sector, and extreme heat creates challenges for workers in Dhaka.
How we identify the opportunities
Business leaders need to understand the forces shaping opportunities and risks in these cities as they strategize about ways to expand or adjust their geographic footprint and grow their customer base. Policymakers, meanwhile, can draw lessons from cities that have developed faster than others, and seek to emulate their success.
The challenge for business leaders and policymakers alike is the lack of quality data on these cities. Most G7 countries have detailed survey data to help with decision-making. Not so in many countries in Asia, Africa, Latin America, and the Middle East. Our data model helps to fill that gap and shed light on the attractiveness of over 1,500 cities.
To overcome the challenges of sourcing and analyzing data from a wide range of cities and levels of development — from Beijing to Cairo, Lome, and Monterrey — we use a novel combination of geospatial analytics, machine learning, and alternative data to create rich insights.
For instance, we recognize that Greater Manila’s international airport and its busy air cargo facilities benefit manufacturers in neighboring cities, not just in the capital itself, so we use spatial analysis to extend our evaluation.
Or consider Istanbul’s retail sector. It’s evidently large, but there’s limited public sector data to track its true strength, so we enrich our insights with location data on everything from the headquarters of major corporations to luxury brand outlets.
1500 Cities by Ranking and Region
Population
<500k
500k-1 million
1-5 million
>5 million
1500 (Low Ranks)
>
(Top Ranks) 1
Commercial Hubs
View profileCountry
Rank#
Population
Export Champions
View profileRank#
Mobility Connectors
View profileRank #
Climate Resilient
View profileRank #
The need to build a portfolio of cities
With better data on the large universe of cities, companies can make better decisions on a variety of questions: Where to build a new factory to strengthen supply chain resilience? How to optimize a retail store network or ensure that sales agents are in the right location? Policymakers can similarly ask: What might future aviation networks look like? How might climate change impact urbanization and the need to invest in enhancing resiliency?
We think of these questions in terms of a company’s geographic portfolio. For instance, when we compared a global high-end retailer with our index of cities serving as commercial hubs, we found the retailer had over 80% of its 500-plus outlets in the top 100 ranked cities, but few or no branches in 40 of those cities. The retailer served some of those cities from larger urban areas less than an hour’s drive away, but others offered a potential expansion opportunity.
We also looked at the supplier footprint of a global clothing brand against our index of climate-resilient cities and found that a material number of suppliers were in cities that are vulnerable to flooding, water stress, or extreme heat risk, such as Chittagong. By contrast, we identified an opportunity for the brand to expand the firm’s supplier presence in Turkish cities that are more resilient, such as Bursa.
What is included?
Our index explores cities across Asia, Africa, Latin America, and the Middle East with populations greater than 250,000. We exclude the world’s more mature markets — especially Europe and North America — where growth rates are lower and the pace of change is often slower.
We recognize that our index includes a range of emerging and developed cities — from Dubai’s stunning skyscrapers to Bissau’s low-slung apartments — that are home to high- and low‑income populations.
However, they are all part of the same growth story. Hong Kong’s banks provide trade financing for manufacturers across the region. Dubai moves passengers between low- and high- income populations. It is their geography that matters, not just their current standard of living.
Think big, look small
We believe it is smaller cities outside of major capitals that stand to benefit most from expanding growth and create some of the greatest opportunities for business and the global economy. These cities are easily overlooked given the lack of data available.
There is precedent for taking a broader view. Between 2010 and 2015, China’s mid-tier and smaller cities added an additional $3.1 trillion to global GDP. That’s the equivalent of adding an economy the size of France to the global economy every five years.
Not every index city is destined to replicate the success of China’s smaller metropolises. But the economic and political forces reshaping our world are presenting a once-in-a-generation opportunity for hundreds of cities to grow rapidly and multinationals a chance to diversify their supply chains and develop new markets. The race to find the winners in today’s emerging cities is on.